The Civil Resolution Tribunal

Joshua Rozenberg QC's comprehensive discussion on online courts, the challenges it faces, and its progress in both the UK and Canada.

British Columbia's Civil Resolution Tribunal is chaired by Shannon Salter. A lawyer who initially specialised in civil litigation, she took a master's degree in the field of access to justice before gaining experience as a tribunal member. Her job as the CRT's first chair is a mixture of judicial, administrative and development work. There are now four other full-time tribunal members and another 38 legally qualified members across British Columbia who sit part-time.Including the two new full-time members and 27 part-time members whose appointments were announced on 11 December 2017. Around 60% are women. However, the CRT is recruiting more members and aiming for a total complement of around 60.Interview with the author, Vancouver BC, 7 December 2017.

The solution explorer was used more than 23,700 times between the summer of 2016 and the end of 2017.Strata: 12,021 new explorations since 13 July 2015. Small claims: 11,706 new explorations since 1 June 2017. Figures correct at 29 December 2017. Source: CRT. From initial explorations of that kind, the CRT currently receives between 350 and 450 new applications for dispute resolution each month. Just over 800 strata claims were lodged during the CRT's first 18 months, as well as around 2,500 small claims in the six months since it began accepting them. Only about 15 per cent of small claims lodged with the tribunal get as far as the adjudication stage, which means that as many as 85 per cent are resolved by negotiation or mediation. Strata claims are more difficult to resolve and so a higher proportion come before the tribunal.

Once a claim reaches the tribunal, everything changes. The CRT no longer has a benign interest in helping people to help themselves. It becomes instead an impartial court with a duty to ensure procedural fairness. Its process is adversarial although its proceedings are normally written. In due course a reasoned decision is sent to the parties and published.

If fairness requires an oral hearing - perhaps because the credibility of a witness is at issue - then a one can be arranged by telephone or through video-conferencing techniques. Parties may address the tribunal from their smart phones or tablets.

"We don't rule out the idea of having an in-person hearing one day, Shannon Salter told me in December 2017.Interview with the author, Vancouver BC, 7 December 2017. "But it hasn't happened yet. In fact, an oral hearing hasn't happened yet. One thing that has surprised us is that no party has so far requested one."

This seemed to contradict the received wisdom that people wanted their day in court - and that the court had to be a physical courtroom. "As it turns out," Shannon Salter told me, people are generally quite happy not to take a day off work or arrange child care to travel to a hearing." Some people found easier to express themselves in writing, she added.

comments

add a comment

    more

    sign in to your account

    Some features of this website require a user account. If you have one, sign in here; if not, create an account or retrieve your password by clicking on the tabs above.

    create an account

    To create an account, simply enter your email address here and we'll send you a link to complete your details. The link, and the email address you give us, will be destroyed if you don't complete your registration within 24 hours.

    forgotten your password?

    You can regain access to your account by entering your email address below; we'll send you a link that you'll need to use within 24 hours.